(Penang, Monday): It
will be a grave error of judgement and bad
example of good governance for the government to dismiss the spiralling concerns
of the 10.07 million Employees Provident Fund (EPF) contributors on the safety
and quality of the RM187 billion EPF funds reflected by the vote of no
confidence passed by 200 unions represented by the Malaysian Trades Union
Congress (MTUC) working committee on the EPF Investment Panel for its failure to
ensure fair returns on the contributors’ savings.
The
statement by the Deputy Finance
Minister, Datuk Chan Kong Choy
that the EPF Investment panel members were appointed by the Finance
Ministry based on their credibility and expertise in investment has failed
completely to answer legitimate and long-standing queries raised by the MTUC, as
for instance, why the EPF’s provision for dimunition in value of equity and
doubtful loans had increased from RM753.65 million in 2000 to RM1.41 billion in
2001.
In
March last year, after the EPF
declared a 6% dividend for 2000, which was the lowest in 25 years, a DAP
delegation met the EPF Chairman, Tan Sri Abdul Halim Ali, and made various
proposals for the restoration of public confidence in the EPF, such as:
Although
Halim undertook at the meeting to raise at the EPF Board the question of a new
EPF policy on accountability and transparency, nothing has happened for over a
year since the meeting and now EPF faces an even bigger crisis of confidence
from the 10.7 million EPF members as a result of a further plunge to 5% dividend
for 2001 - the lowest in 37 years.
DAP
calls on the Cabinet on Wednesday to respond to the widespread and deep-seated
concerns and alarms of the 10.07 million EPF contributors about the safety,
liquidity and yield of their EPF savings by setting up a Royal Commission of
Inquiry into the RM187 billion EPF investment decisions to restore the
confidence of the EPF members and the labour movement in the EPF.
Over
the years, the EPF Board had ignored calls that the EPF should adopt the
best practices of good corporate governance especially in terms of
accountability and transparency, and it is most regrettable and deplorable that
after half a century, the EPF is not prepared to establish a
mechanism whereby the EPF Board could be accountable to the over 10.07
million EPF members with regard to its investment policy and decisions.
Last
year, EPF invested RM39.77 billion or 21.28% its total investments of RM186.95
billion in loans and bonds, RM42.58 billion or 22.78% in equities and RM34.97
billion or 18.70% in money market instruments. These are astronomical sums
and the list of the beneficiaries of huge EPF loans, the full details of
the stocks and shares and money market instruments bought with EPF monies should
be made available to the public in keeping with the highest
standards of good corporate governance and the principles of accountability and
transparency.
The
EPF has a history of dubious transactions where the EPF funds were used as
a ready cash-rich source to bail-out troubled companies when its first and
last agenda should be to promote the best interests of the EPF contributors.
In
the 1980s, the EPF was raided to fund dubious transactions resulting in the
EPF-Makuwasa scandal, causing huge losses to the EPF. The
EPF-Makuwasa scandal came about because the government wanted to recoup
the RM600 million losses suffered in a misguided attempt to corner the London
tin-market through the Maminco operations in the early eighties, which backfired
instead.
In
recent times, the EPF’s involvement in the RM1.88 billion Time dotCom
IPO fiasco last year and dubious and questionable loan facilities running into
billions of ringgit to various mega-projects and companies, like the billion
ringgit loans to Perwaja Terengganu Sdn. Bhd., the RM500 million loan in 1996
to Time Telecommunications Holdings Bhd (renamed Time dotCom),
RM767 million in investments and loans to STAR LRT, , Bakun hydroelectric
dam project, etc., have brought to the fore the question as to whether the
safeguarding of the EPF members’ interest had been subordinated and even
sacrificed to other considerations and agendas.
The
EPF, which invested RM42.58 billion in equity last year and whose stock
market investments are expected to
touch RM50 billion this year, is the biggest
"mover and shaker" in the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange. But the EPF contributors are entitled to ask as to
who really benefits from the EPF being the biggest “mover and shaker” in the
stock market - whether the 10.07 million EPF contributors or the EPF fund
managers.
The
Royal Commission of Inquiry into the EPF investments, which should be required
to complete its findings within a year, should
have broad terms of reference, including to:
(22/4/2002)