Has Barisan Alternative Presidential Council given its approval to the PAS Terengganu Syariah Criminal Enactment Bill although it violates the 1999 Barisan Alternative Common Manifesto?


Media Conference Statement (2)
- when launching the second phase of the  “No to 911, No to 929, Yes to 1957” People’s Awareness Campaign
by Lim Kit Siang

(Ipoh,  Friday): DAP reiterates its call to Datuk Seri Hadi Awang, PAS Terengganu Mentri Besar, to withdraw the Terengganu Syariah Criminal Enactment Bill because it is clearly against the Federal Constitution, violates human rights, discriminates against women and contrary to the 1999 Barisan Alternative Common Manifesto “Towards A Just Malaysia”. 

Nobody in PAS, whether at the national or state level, disputes that Terengganu Syariah Criminal Enactment Bill violates the Federal Constitution and the rule of law, especially its provisions of amputation of limbs for theft, 80 lashes for a woman who reports  but unable to prove that she had been raped, stoning to death for adultery and  death for apostasy, contravening the constitutional limits of “3-5-6” restricting  state syariah laws from  imposing sentences exceeding three years’ jail, RM5,000 fine or six strokes of the rotan. 

At the Parti Keadilan Nasional public forum on “Syariah laws – concept and implementation” at Shah Alam on Monday night, Hadi said that the laws under hudud are commanded by Allah.  This is not the language of democracy but the language of theocracy. 

This is why when the DAP was in the Barisan Alternative, we wanted to thrash out with the PAS leadership the fundamental issues as to whether the PAS’ concept of Islamic state is compatible with democracy, power-sharing in a plural society, human rights, women rights, social tolerance, development and modernity, and decided to pull out of Barisan Alternative when we failed to resolve these irreconcilable differences. 

When DAP was in the Barisan Alternative, there was a clear understanding that any controversial proposal  or enactment by the PAS state governments in Kelantan and Terengganu which affect the sensitivities of the different races and religions would be referred to the BA Presidential Council for a  consensus to be reached first. 

Has the Barisan Alternative Presidential Council given its approval to the presentation of the Terengganu Syariah Criminal Enactment Bill although it violates the 1999 Barisan Alternative Common Manifesto “Towards A Just Malaysia”? 

In the 1999 Barisan Alternative Common Manifesto, all component parties had made a commitment to uphold the fundamental principles of the Malaysian Constitution, which is  flouted by the Terengganu Syariah Criminal Enactment Bill. 

This is why the BA Presidential Council and the other parties in BA should explain whether and why they had agreed to the Terengganu Syariah Criminal Enactment Bill. 

I am surprised to read the Malaysiakini report yesterday where  the Parti Keadilan Nasional supreme council member, Dr. Lee Boon Chye, as good as declared support for the Terengganu Syariah Criminal Enactment Bill, except for “more dialogues between PAS and various groups on the issue” on the ground that it is “very difficult for Muslims to reject the Islamic state or hudud law”. 

In his 18 years as UMNO leader, Anwar Ibrahim had never declared support for the Kelantan  Hudud Bill.  Why is Keadilan now supporting the Terengganu Syariah Criminal Enactment Bill? 

(5/7/2002)


*Lim Kit Siang - DAP National Chairman