http://dapmalaysia.org Forward Feedback
Liong Sik, were
there commissions
paid out to someone
on the purchase of
Nanyang Press 5
years ago?
Media
Statement
by Ronnie
Liu Tian Khiew
(Petaling
Jaya , Saturday): Former MCA boss Ling Liong Sik maintains that "it was a good buy" despite of the big losses incurred in the Nanyang Press deal and the fact the MCA was forced to sell its controlling stakes to Ezywood, a company controlled directly by the Sinchew boss, Tiong Hiew King. Tiong now holds 44.76% and MCA still holds about 23.38% in the Nanyang press in order to keep Nanyang Siang Pao and China Press as party mouthpieces. His former deputy Lim Ah Lek has estimated the losses at about RM100 million. He even said that the amount is more than enough to buy another Wisma MCA (which was estimated at below the RM100 million mark by a local property expert friend of mine). He said Liong Sik was "solely responsible" for the debacle and he had wanted Liong Sik to apologise to MCA and the Chinese community which has opposed the deal vehemently 5 years ago. Ah Lek also revealed for the first time that in November 1989, Liong Sik was trying to sell The Star (39%) to Lim Tien Kiat of Malaysian Plantation Berhad for no reasons. Ling was saying how successful and important The Star to MCA in his recent interview. If that is so, why Liong Sik has wanted to sell The Star at that time? It was indeed very strange for Liong Sik to buy the Nanyang Press despite of the strong protest from the customers (readers and advertisers) and members. We want Liong Sik to tell us whether commissions were paid out to someone in the fishy Nanyang deal. And by the way, who is Andrew Leong, Mr Ling? Or May be the present MCA boss Ong Ka Ting could shed some light on the mystery. Anyway, besides saying the Nanyang deal was a majority decision although it was only a narrow 157-vote majority, Liong Sik has indirectly put the blame on his former boss Dr Mahathir Mohamad when he said in a recent interview that "of course we need permission from the PM since it's a major media institution. If we have the PM's backing, it would be very helpful. I think without the PM's okay… and knowing the sensitivity of the media, I don't think it would have been possible to buy." May be Dr Mahathir could still remember what was transpired then and he may want to tell us the truth. On 9th October 2006, some 45 multi-lingual and multiethnic civil society organizations working on diverse issues and political party have strongly objected to the MCA's sale of 21.02% shares in Nanyang Press to Ezywood. Their joint statement stated that "that all top four Chinese dailies are now concentrated in the hand of a party-business alliance is detrimental to press freedom and democratic space in Malaysia. Such development calls for reforms in media laws including the repeal of Printing Presses and Publications Act and the introduction of anti-monopoly clauses."
For the same reason, Umno should relinquish all their shares in NST,
Berita Harian, Utusan Malaysia, and MCA should relinquish all their
shares in The Star. MIC and PBB should also sell all their shares in
the Tamil and English papers in their staples.
"Since the takeover, Nanyang Siang Pao suffered a progressive decline
in readership and advertising revenue, resulting in a loss of RM
6,309,000 for the Nanyang Press group in the last financial year. This
proves that the takeover was not only politically unpopular, but also
economically not feasible."
Ser Choon Ing, Chairperson, Civil Rights Committee, KLSCAH
(21/10/2006)
* Ronnie Liu Tian Khiew,
DAP CEC member and NGO Bureau Chief |