Press Statement by Charles Santiago in Klang on
Friday, 26th September 2008:
Investigate the 2006 radioactive
leak in Klang, protect public health & environment
I am appalled to note that the
Malaysian Defence Ministry had been complacent about the radioactive
leak by the US nuclear-powered submarine USS Houston, which was berthed
at Westport, Klang from September 16th to September 21st, 2006.
This has implications for health, environment and quality of life of my
constituents in Klang.
I call upon Prime Minister and newly minted Minister of Defence Abdullah
Ahmad Badawi to investigate the radioactive leak and take the necessary
action to overcome any problems that could have developed since two
years ago
On 8 August 2008, the Ministry's Director of Public Relations Col
Fadzlette Osman Merican
said investigation was not carried out because
no report of the leak was received.
But according to a CNN news report dated 7 August 2008, the US navy
acknowledged the submarine leaked radiation since 2006 and
had informed
the Malaysian and Singapore governments that the submarine made port
calls while leaking the radioactive water.
While the Singaporean Defense Minister Teo Chee Hean had to
answer
questions relating to the leak in Parliament last month, our authorities
adapted the classic response of complacency.
The Singaporean government had requested the US navy to provide more
information related to the leak and undertook an Integrated Environment
Monitoring System (IEMS) at Changi Naval Base which could analyze air
and water quality and detect abnormal levels of radiation.
Likewise the ports in Japan were on alert when the submarine was docked
there early August this year. The Chief Cabinet Secretary Nobutaka
Machimura
said that a 24-hour radiation monitoring was conducted by the
government during the Houston's port call in Japan.
The Malaysian government did nothing. Maybe they were swayed by the rosy
picture painted by the US navy, which indicated that the cumulative
amount of radioactivity that could have leaked was less that the amount
found in a common smoke detector.
Basically there is no such thing as negligible radioactive leak. The
submarine was carrying nuclear warheads and is therefore prone to using
highly radioactive substances.
There is also no absolute protection against radioactive leak. Although
I am aware that some shielding like lead would have been used, the
Malaysian government must pressurize the US navy to disclose and be
transparent about the procedure used to measure cumulative exposure.
This is imminent as the cumulative exposure is never seen in a matter of
days but manifests itself in years to come. As such, the US navy's
account of one soldier being contaminated by the leak and yet uninjured
cannot be taken into account.
I urge the new Defence Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi to seriously form
a team of experts to investigate if the radioactive spill complies with
or exceeds the standards set by the United Nations Scientific Committee
on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) and International
Commission on Radiological Protection.
The government should impose stringent conditions before the permission
to dock is given to nuclear-powered vehicles. It must also put in place
an independent monitoring system to take readings of air quality, water
and sea-bed samples to determine the normal background environmental
radiation level. This reading could be used to, in turn, evaluate any
abnormal level of radiation.
Failure to do so would only go to show that Abdullah and the government
are not serious about the potential health hazards caused by the
radioactive leak to public health, marine life and the environment.
It would also fail to instil confidence in Malaysia's plan to go nuclear
by 2023.
* Charles Santiago, MP for Klang