BM 中文 English

Letter to CEO of SPAD by MP for Serdang, Dr. Ong Kian Ming on the East Coast Rail Link

CEO of SPAD
Encik Mohd Azharuddin bin Mat Sah
Block D, Platinum Sentral, Jalan Stesen Sentral 2,
Kuala Lumpur Sentral, 50470 Kuala Lumpur

Yang Berusaha Encik Mohd Azharuddin,

RE: Feedback and Clarification on the East Coast Rail Link (ECRL)

Based on Section 84 of the Land Transport Act 2010, SPAD began the 3-month process of public consultation and seeking public feedback on the East Coast Rail Link (ECRL) on the 8th of March 2017.[1] As a Member of Parliament and a concerned citizen, I hope that SPAD can provide clarification and information on the following points raised below.

1. Provide detailed breakdown of the cost of the ECRL

In a report by the Edge in November 2016, Transport Minister Dato Seri Liow Tiong Lai said the following to explain the increase in the estimated cost of the East Coast Rail Line (ECRL) from RM29 billion to RM55 billion. “Previously, the length [of the rail link] was 545km; now it is 600km and this does not include the part from Gombak to Port Klang”[2] But on the 13th of May, 2017, during the signing ceremony of Phase Two of the ECRL project, which covers the track from the Integrated Transport Terminal (ITT) Gombak to Port Klang, the Treasury Secretary General, Tan Sri Irwan Srinegar was reported to have said that the construction costs for this section for this section of the ECRL was RM9 billion, which, combined with the RM46 billion cost for Phase One for Wakaf Bahru in Kelantan to ITT Gombak in Selangor, would bring the total cost of the ECRL to RM55 billion.[3] This contradicts what was said by Liow Tiong Lai. In the interest of transparency, the government should publish a detailed breakdown of the estimated cost of the entire ECRL including the cost of the 7 segments of the ECRL and the 6 Spur Lines:

Segments

Spur Lines
Segment 1: Kelantan

Segment 2: Terengganu North (Besut to Setiu to Kuala Nerus to Kuala Terenganu)

Segment 3: Terengganu South (Marang to Dungun to Kemamam)

Segment 4: Pahang East (Kuantan to Maran)

Segment 5: Pahang West (Temerloh to Bentong)

Segment 6: Selangor East (Pahang to ITT Gombak)

Segment 7: Selangor West (ITT Gombak to Port Klang)

1. Bukit Besi

2. Kerteh

3. Kemamam

4. Kuantan Port City

5. Kuantan Sentral

6. Mentakab

The government should also provide an estimated breakdown of the land acquisition costs which will involve the government buying 8699 lots of private land covering 8376.88 acres or 3390 hectares.

2. Clarify if the cost of the project only involves a SINGLE TRACK railway line as it is described in the EIA report

In the Executive Summary of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report on the ECRL, it is stated that “the ECRL will be an electrified single track railway line built on a double track formation, approximately 532.3km for the main line with another 65.9km of spur lines.” Does this mean that only a single track will be built for the ECRL even though a railway base that is wide enough for two tracks will be built? If this is the case, then the government needs to explain why a project which costs an estimated RM55 billion will only pay for ONE TRACK.

I would like to point that the promotional video and materials shown in the public display, on the MRL website and in the youtube videos all indicate that the ECRLhas two tracks, not one.

3. Clarify the total length of bridges and viaducts for the ECRL

In a statement on the 9th of November, 2016 by Minister in charge of the Economic Planning Unit (EPU), Datuk Rahman Dahlan, he said that the ECRL will involve building 110km of bridges.[4] Based on the SPAD public display drawings, a section by section calculation showed 69 bridges with a combined length of 17.7km and 33 viaducts with a combined length of 74.6km. Therefore, the total length of bridges and viaducts (assuming that viaducts are also bridges) is 92.3km. There is a difference of 17.7km between Rahman Dahlan’s statement and our calculations based on the SPAD public display drawings. A difference of 17.7km can translate into billions of ringgit of construction costs. This needs to be clarified by the government.

4. Explain the rush to sign the agreement for Phase 2 of the ECRL connecting ITT Gombak with Port Klang

My colleague, ADUN for Damansara Utama, Yeo Bee Yin, had earlier raised the issue of the missing link from ITT Gombak to Klang in the current EIA report available for public display.[5] SPAD responded by saying that there was no missing link and that the link from ITT Gombak to Klang is part of Phase 2 of the ECRL project. SPAD also said that “when the due processes are completed and the extension is ready for execution, SPAD will hold a public display of the conditionally approved railway scheme for this alignment prior to execution”[6] If the due processes have not been completed, why did the government sign a supplementary agreement with the China Communications Construction Company (CCCC) during Najib’s visit to Beijing recently for Phase 2 of the ECRL Project?[7]

MP for Serdang
Letter to CEO of SPAD by Dr. Ong Kian Ming on the East Coast Rail Link on Friday, 19th May 2017