Malaysian Parliament should set aside the 2003 Budget debate to  pass an all-party motion  to deplore the Israeli rejection of the UN Security Council resolution to end the siege of Arafat and expeditious withdrawal of Israeli forces from Occupied Palestine


Media Statement 
by Lim Kit Siang

(Petaling Jaya, Wednesday): The Israeli government of Ariel Sharon has continued to defy  world opinion and morality with the Israeli army killing nine Palestinians in one of the biggest raids in the Gaza Strip while the United Nations Security Council was debating the Middle East and the  swift official Israeli rejection of the UN Security Council resolution demanding Israel end its siege of Yasser Arafat’s compound and the “expeditious withdrawal” of Israeli forces from Occupied  Palestine. 

Yesterday, the Security Council by a vote of 14 in favour to none against, with United States abstaining, demanded that Israel immediately cease measures in and around Ramallah, including the destruction of Palestinian civilian and security infrastructure, and the withdrawal of Israeli forces towards positions held prior to September 2,000.   The resolution also called on the Palestinian Authority to meet its expressed commitment to bring to justice those responsible for terrorist acts. 

In rejecting the UN Security Council resolution demanding the end of the Ramallah siege of Arafat, Israeli official sources have said that military operations, including the Ramallah siege, would continue and “gradually intensify” in the Gaza Strip specifically.

The Malaysian Parliament should set aside the 2003 Budget debate to pass an all-party motion  to express the world outrage and to deplore the Israeli rejection of the UN Security Council resolution to end the siege of Arafat and expeditious withdrawal of Israeli forces from Occupied Palestine. 

British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, should be standing up in the House of Commons to present a case as to how Anglo-American efforts could restore peace to the Middle East by ending the Israeli state terrorism in the Palestinian territory instead of presenting the dossier entitled “Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction – the Assessment of the British Government”, which had been described as  “damp squib” and “PR stunt” by his Parliamentary backbenchers as it did not add a great deal of information to what was already known. 

US President Bush should re-prioritise US foreign policy  to give greater importance and urgency to end the Palestinian conflict instead of going to war against Saddam Hussein of Iraq, as he would only be  giving  credence to the view that in the absence of credible evidence of  immediate and imminent threat of weapons of mass destruction (WMD)  from Iraq, Bush is more interested in getting rid of Saddam Hussein than in ensuring effective WMD inspections under the auspices of the United Nations or the achievement of durable peace in the Middle East.

(25/9/2002)


*Lim Kit Siang - DAP National Chairman