Excerpts 
		of the speech by Lim Guan Eng in Sultan Hotel, Jakarta during the 2nd 
		World Peace Forum organised by Muhammadiyah In Co-operation With Cheng 
		Ho Multi-Culture Trust Released in Kuala Lumpur on Thursday, 26th June 
		2008: 
        
		An educational framework based on peace, a loving family unit, religious 
		and civilisational dialogues and understanding are not sufficient to 
		stop violence; a government practicing ethical and moral leadership is a 
		necessary condition 
        Evil exists 
		because good people do nothing. Violence exists because peacemakers do 
		nothing. The 2nd World Peace Forum is an effort by religious leaders, 
		scholars, peacemakers and good people to do something.
		The 2nd World 
		Peace Forum organized by Muhammadiyah, the second largest Islamic 
		organization in Indonesia with 30 million members, together with Cheng 
		Ho Multi-Culture Trust is part of continuing efforts to reduce and 
		finally stop the violence that has only caused much tragedy, pain and 
		sorrow to many parts of the world. The organizers must be applauded for 
		carrying out such difficult work and unrewarding work for the good of 
		humanity with much persistence and dedication.
		Violence 
		between individuals though shocking is not as horrifying as 
		state-inspired violence committed by governments against masses of 
		people for selfish political or national interests. South-East Asia has 
		witnessed such violence as late as the ’70s during the Vietnam War and 
		in Pol Pot’s Kampuchea that scarred two generations with death, injury 
		and inhumane genocide of millions of innocent civilians. For this reason 
		whilst we may go back to our basic spiritual roots of family and 
		education, such efforts will be in vain if we do not rein in governments 
		from committing violence.
		In other 
		words, an educational framework based on peace, a loving family unit, 
		religious and civilisational dialogues, and understanding are not 
		sufficient to stop violence; we would still require a government 
		practicing ethical and moral leadership as a necessary condition. Let me 
		go back to the ethos of this World Peace Forum based on the triple bonds 
		of “one humanity, one destiny and one responsibility”.
		My 
		interpretation of this triple bond is that we are one humanity because 
		we all belong to the human race regardless of our skin colour, our race, 
		our religion, our gender or even our political beliefs. We all belong to 
		one species. We have a single destiny together to rule the planet Earth 
		as the dominant species. With power comes responsibility. We have been 
		entrusted with the singular responsibility to leave this planet a better 
		place.
		And yet 
		despite our shared humanity, destiny and responsibility, we are prone to 
		violence. Some will say that violence is inherent in carnivorous living 
		beings pointing to predatory animals like lions, sharks and tigers. But 
		predators kill to survive and do not commit mass murder like governments 
		that carries out mindless and barbaric violence. Humanity has committed 
		too many atrocities not only against each other but also against other 
		species resulting in the extinction of many plant and animal species. If 
		we are not careful, we may cause more extermination including the human 
		race.
		So why do we 
		engage in mindless and barbaric violence when we are supposed to have 
		the capacity to think? Part of the reason lies in misconceptions of 
		manhood, power and dominance where human greed is allowed free rein. Has 
		it not been said in all the holy religious books, that
		the resources on Earth is sufficient to meet all the wants of the entire 
		humanity and all creatures created by God but is never enough to meet 
		the greed of one individual?
		This greed is 
		given validity in statecraft such as realpolitik and geopolitics. 
		Realpolitik and geopolitics sanctions the use of violence to achieve its 
		purposes. The use of war appears to be even a natural outcome of 
		geopolitics. Geopolitics is sometimes defined as the relationship 
		between space and people. When a growing population fills up the 
		geographical space in a state, the need of more space justifies war and 
		violence to gain more territory to feed and accommodate its growing 
		population.
		The ends 
		justifies the means approach has caused great injustice and oppression. 
		Geopolitics and realpolitik has held sway for centuries before being 
		challenged in the new century by the onset of globalization. Unlike 
		geopolitics relationship between space and people, globalization is more 
		about the relationship between people and people. Globalisation stresses 
		on human interconnectivity where ability, expertise and diligence counts 
		more than privilege, preferential treatment and entitlement in this flat 
		world ruled by computers and Internet that has broken down borders as 
		described by Thomas Friedman in his book “The World Is Flat”.
		In this new 
		borderless flat world, human capital formation has suddenly become the 
		most critical element of productivity and economic growth. With the 
		stress on human capital formation, the people suddenly matter more than 
		in the past. Government cannot dictate as they please but must heed 
		public opinion. Even dictators must cloak themselves with democracy and 
		popular support to attain legitimacy.
		For this 
		reason, globalization and the borderless world of the Internet has given 
		ordinary people who normally are inconsequential in the decision-making 
		process the leverage to compel governments to forsake war for peace and 
		to preach non-violence over violence. Only when governments who start 
		wars practise moral and ethical leadership, can we stop violence.
		As a 
		corollary to human capital formation of globalization, this humanizing 
		of government by necessity requires spiritual capital formation. 
		Spiritual capital formation would be helped by civilisational dialogues 
		and religious interactions that focuses on universal values that unite 
		us. All religions revolve around sound education, family and a basic 
		adherence to spiritual values of faith, hope and love. Governments must 
		also profess and give faith, hope and love. The people must have faith 
		that governments are there to help, not harm them; the government must 
		give hope to the young that there is a bright future with equal 
		opportunities and social justice; and that the government must show love 
		for the people based on human dignity, compassion and a caring society.
		In short, 
		human capital formation from the purely economic perspective centred on 
		CAT principles of Competency, Accountability and Transparency is crucial 
		for good governance. But it is not enough. Spiritual capital formation 
		is also required for a government to practise ethical and moral 
		leadership based on faith, hope and love. Only with both human and 
		spiritual capital formation in government, can we succeed in ending 
		violence globally.
        
		*
    
    
 Lim Guan Eng, Penang Chief 
		Minister, DAP 
        Secretary-General & MP for Bagan