http://dapmalaysia.org  

Investigation on Chang Ming Thien Foundation - Second police report by DAP


Police Report
by
Ronnie Liu

(Petaling Jaya, Saturday): This is my second police report following my first police report made on Sunday, 23 March 2003 at the Petaling Jaya Police Headquarters.

In a joint statement released by Chang Ming Thien Foundation (CMTF) and Multi-purpose Holdings(MPHB) on Sunday, 25 July 2004 (refer to press cuttings), the Foundation has finally started to allocate a sum of RM3 million as interest-free study loan for needy and deserving university students, after a delay of more than twenty years.

The joint statement also states that MPHB has agreed to donate RM 8 million to the Foundation “after a series of discussions”. It states that the total fund in the Foundation is now standing at RM26, 500, 000. ( Note: If one adds the RM8 million donated by MPHB to the sum of RM18,700,000 as announced by Ling Liong Sik on 15 March 2003, it should now stands at no less than RM26,700,000)

More importantly, the total fund in the Foundation should be much more than the figure disclosed by Ong Ka Ting. If one refers to the past 20 years interest rates issued by the Bank Negara (from 1980 to 2002), the principal plus interest accrued for savings account would have reached no less than RM26 million. But no organisation in the right mind will place a sum of RM10 million in a savings account.  

I would argue that if the sum of RM10 million was placed in a 12- month fixed deposit account, the total fund as of today ( August 7, 2004) should be no less than RM 50 million! It could even reach the tune of RM70 million if the money was placed with negotiable Banker’s Acceptance over the past twenty years.

The joint statement also states that the Foundation was incorporated only as late as 18 April 1990. Both CMTF and MPHB have deliberately omitted the date of receiving donation from the late Chang Ming Thien. This has created a big question mark, as the late Chang Ming Thien has donated the amount of RM10 million in the early eighties. Apart from the late incorporation, what has happened to the principal sum and the interest accrued from the early eighties to 1990?

It was also stated in the statement that “soon after the incorporation, the Foundation was unfortunately the subject of litigation, which has taken (10) years to resolve and ultimately concluded on 18th November 2002.”  The picture painted by CMTF and MPHB in the joint statement did not reflect the actual situation, as both parties had in the past cited internal party squabbles in MCA and the deposit-taking cooperatives scandal as the main reasons for not being able to start the operation of the Foundation (refer to newspaper advertisements published by the Foundation).

Although the Foundation was bogged down by party internal squabbles, co-op scandals and legal battles, that should not in any way affect the fund from enjoying interest from the bank accounts, if the money was deposited safely and “untouched” in the bank.

By the way, the public was told that the late Chang family had initiated the suit simply because those entrusted with the fund did not utilise the money for the right purpose, i.e. scholarship and study loan for the needy and deserving students to pursue tertiary education.

Can MCA or the CMTF Board of Trustees give the Malaysian public a good explanation on all these questions?

My first police report was based on various statements issued by Ling Liong Sik, the former MCA President and the Chairman of the Chang Ming Thien Foundation.

In a statement released on Thursday, 2003-02-27, MCA's President Dato Seri (now Tun) Dr Ling Liong Sik has said that the Chang Ming Thien's Foundation stood at RM18, 000,000, and he intends to release a sum of RM2 million to the UTAR (set up and controlled by MCA) for scholarship or study loan.

Again on Saturday, 2003-03-15, Ling Liong Sik announced publicly that the account of Chang Ming Thien has been audited and stood at RM18,700, 000 ( note: an increase of RM700,000 compared to the figure announced on 27 Feb 2003). But at the same time, he said the foundation could be more than RM20, 000, 000 if added with interest. This has clearly shown that he has failed to provide an exact figure.

This came as a surprise to all Malaysians who have been following the Chang Ming Thien Foundation closely.

If one was to work out the interest according to the rates published by the Bank Negara (see attached rates published by the Bank Negara, V.1 Interest Rates: Banking Institutions) for the past 22 years, assuming interest would be paid only at the end of every year, one would know that the original principal sum of RM10, 000,000 could have collected a real interest of at least RM16, 284, 224 if it was based on savings account interest rate.

The 10-million Ringgit donation from the late Chang Ming Thien could have accumulated to RM 46,208,380.71 if the money was placed as 12-month fixed deposit for 22 years.

It should have accumulated even more interest if the RM10m fund was placed by way of Banker's Acceptance (in which one can negotiate with the bank for an interest rate higher than any fixed deposit accounts).

Under normal circumstances, much of the fund should have been deposited by way of Banker's Acceptance at a negotiated rate for better returns.

If the education fund was managed well and good by the MCA, it could have benefited more than 124,566 needy students (based on RM4, 000 per student per annum). And the Foundation should continue to benefit up to 13,429 students every year.

Both the present and former MCA presidents owes the public a full explanation on why the Chang Min Thien Foundation stands at only RM18, 700,000 after 22 years " untouched" in the bank.

They were trusted to manage the fund donated by the late Chang Ming Thien. The late Chang Ming Thien's family and the Malaysian public have the right to see that the fund would not be misappropriated. They also have the right to know why the interest collected is way below the expectation of the public.

In my first police report, I have also enclosed a chart illustrating the possible amount of interest collected with a principal sum of RM10 million, tabulated based on rates published by the Bank Negara from 1980 to 2002

I.        As at end of the year                        II.        Savings account interest rates
III.        12 - month interest rates                        IV.        BLR        
V.        Number of students could have benefited from the interest generated
_________________________________________________________________
I    II                            III                            IV                                             V
1980 6.00% RM10, 600,000.00 9.00% RM10, 900,000.00 8.50%   RM10, 850,000.00  213

1981 7.00% RM11, 342,000.00 11.00% RM12, 099,000.00 8.50%  RM11, 772,250.00  443

1982 6.50% RM12, 079,230.00 10.00% RM13, 308,900.00 8.50%  RM12, 772,891.25  693

1983 6.00% RM12, 803,983.80 9.00% RM14, 506,701.00 10.75%  RM14, 145,977.06         1,036

1984 7.50% RM13, 764,282.59 10.75% RM16, 066,171.36 12.25% RM$ 15,878,859.25        1,470

1985 6.00% RM14, 590,139.54 7.50% RM17, 271,134.21 10.75%  RM17, 585,836.62         1,896

1986 6.00% RM15, 465,547.91 7.00% RM18, 480,113.60 10.00%  RM19, 344,420.28        2,336

1987 3.50% RM16, 006,842.09 4.25% RM19, 265,518.43 7.50%   RM20, 795,251.80         2,699

1988 3.50% RM 16,567,081.56 4.25% RM20, 084,302.97 7.00%   RM22, 250,919.43         3,063

1989 3.42% RM17, 133,675.75 5.40% RM21, 168,855.33 6.99%   RM23, 806,258.70         3,452

1990 3.43% RM17, 721,360.83 7.21% RM22, 695,129.79 7.49%   RM25, 589,347.47         3,897

1991 3.34% RM18, 313,254.28 8.19% RM24, 553,860.92 8.68%   RM27, 810,502.83         4,453

1992 3.32% RM18, 921,254.32 7.84% RM26, 478,883.62 9.29% RM30, 394,098.55         5,099

1993 3.99% RM19, 676,212.37 6.29% RM28, 144,405.40 8.22% RM32, 892,493.45         5,723

1994 3.54% RM20, 372,750.29 6.15% RM29, 875,286.33 6.83% RM35, 139,050.75         6,285

1995 3.70% RM21, 126,542.05 6.89% RM31, 933,693.56 8.03% RM37, 960,716.52         6,990

1996 4.10% RM21, 992,730.27 7.26% RM34, 252,079.71 9.18% RM41, 445,510.30         7,861

1997 4.23% RM22, 923,022.77 9.33% RM37, 447,798.75 10.33% RM45, 726,831.51         8,932

1998 3.87% RM23, 810,143.75 5.74% RM39, 597,302.40 8.04% RM49, 403,268.77         9,851

1999 2.76% RM24, 467,303.71 3.95% RM41, 161,395.84 6.79% RM52, 757,750.72         10,689

2000 2.72% RM25, 132,814.37 4.08% RM42, 840,780.80 6.78% RM56, 334,726.22         11,584

2001 2.28% RM25, 705,842.54 3.71% RM44, 430,173.76 6.31% RM59, 889,447.44         12,472

2002 2.25% RM26, 284,224.00 4.00% RM46, 207,380.71 6.39% RM63, 716,383.13         13,429

 

(7/8/2004)


* Ronnie Liu Tian Khiew, DAP Education Bureau Chairman and national publicity secretary