Kajang municipality MPKj finally acknowledged the legitimate and
relentless struggle put up by the Bandar Sg Long hawkers and residents
over the controversial "shit pond" wet market.
_______________________________________
Media
Statement
by Ronniu Liew Thian Khiew
____________________________________________
(Petaling
Jaya,
Thusday):
After suffering from a denial syndrome for close to two months, the
Kajang municipality MPKj finally acknowledged the legitimate and
relentless struggle put up by the Bandar Sg Long hawkers and residents
over the controversial "shit pond" wet market. MPKj has agreed to move
the wet market away from the IndahWater oxidation pond to a new site
away from the oxidation pond.
Cheras MP Tan Kok Wai and DAP Selangor have been sympathetic with
struggle of the hawkers and residents from day one. We have brought
their case to the Selangor Menteri Besar office last Saturday after
the hawkers and residents have failed to get any help from the MCA
President Datuk Seri Ong Ka Ting, who happens to be Minister for
Housing and Local Government.
This is indeed a sweet victory for the Bandar Sg Long Hawkers' Rights
Action Committee led by pork seller Yap Keam Hui and the Evergreen
Condos residents who were fighting hard to keep their serene and
peaceful living environment.
Credits must also be given to the local DAP branch led by Sdr Tan Han
Kuo and Lee Kee Hiong. They have been championing the cause without
fear or favour throughout the struggle.
The residents and hawkers can now focus their struggle on getting MPKj
and the township’s developer to build a permanent market and hawker
centre in Bandar Sg Long.
The site earmarked for the market and hawker centre in the Bandar Sg
Long master plan is now used as an open air car park for the
MCA-linked UTAR. Both MPKj and the developer Sin Heap Lee-Marubeni Sdn
Bhd have failed to explain why the market was still not up after more
than 12 years. They have clearly contravened with the Town and Country
Planning Act and other legislations.
The "shit pond" market controversy in a way has reflected the
importance of the third vote campaign launched by the DAP since March
this year. The incident would not have taken place if the councilors
need to pass the test of the people every two or three years in
elections.
We believe the restoration of local government elections would go a
long way to democratize the decision-making process of all local
governments.
(30/6/2005)
*
Ronnie Liu Tian Khiew, DAP International Secretary and NGO bureau chief