Early British colonial
period
In
Malaysia, the idea of elections to form a government of elected
representatives of the people started with British occupation.
The first recorded elections in Malayan history is the Municipal
elections in Penang in
1911. Apparently there were two candidates and the defeated
candidate lodged a protest that the other had hired a motorbus
to convey voters to the poll. In any event this first experiment
appears to have been a false start because in 1913 the British
colonial power transformed the partly elected governing body of
the Penang municipality into one wholly appointed by the
Governor 1.
Second World War And Road to Self
Government
The next phase appears to fast forward to the Second World War,
the Japanese occupation and the return of the British, this time
with the myth of their invincibility shattered. This was also
the period of nationalism and independence movements in Asia.
In this phase, free elections emerged as part of the British
colonial regime’s programme to grant independence to
Malaya.
After the Second World War, the British mooted the idea of the
Malayan Union which came into force on
April 1, 1946. Opposition from
the Malays led to its replacement by the Federation of Malaya
under the Federation of Malaya Agreement of February 1, 1948.
The latter envisaged self-government for the territory and to
that end provided for the introduction of legislation that would
lead to the election of members to the legislatures of the
component states of the Federation and to the national
legislature. The progress to a fully elected national chamber
was visualized as a progress from local authority elections to
the state-level elections and finally to the Federal Legislative
Council.
It
was this vision that led to the passage of the Local
Authorities Elections
Ordinance 1950.
Under this Ordinance the first nominations were received for the
municipal elections of Malacca on November 1, 1951 but all the
candidates were returned unopposed. The Penang municipal
elections was on December 1, 1951 and was the first popular
elections for government at any level after the formation of the
Federation of Malaya.
Kuala Lumpur then held
its own elections in 1952.
Thereafter the Local
Councils Ordinance 1952
extended the system of elected
local authorities to areas not covered by the Local Authorities
Elections Ordinance 1950. This included New Villages into which
people were forced during the communist insurgency which began
in 1948. All residents, including non-citizens were permitted to
vote and be candidates 2.
Independence and self-governance
The first federal elections of 1955 and national independence on
31st August 1957 saw a vibrant extension of elections
for the local government in various centers especially George
Town, Malacca, Ipoh, Seremban, Johore Bahru and Taiping. In the
1950’s and 1960’s there were 373 local authorities that had well
over 3000 elected representatives out of a total of some 4,223
local councilors. This number excluded those of the
Kuala Lumpur
Municipality, which came under a separate jurisdiction because
it was the federal capital 3.
Voting Pattern
While at the federal level, the Alliance swept the elections of
1955 and won comfortably in 1959 (except for Terengganu and
Kelantan which fell to PMIP) at the elections for the local
government, the pattern of voting was different.
The opposition Labour Party, the Peoples Progressive Party and
the Malayan Party all demonstrated the ability to win in urban
areas where their strength was centred.
The Table below illustrates the voting trend from 1956-1961 in
various urban centers 4.
Seats won in selected local
authority elections
|
Party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alliance |
Lab/SF |
NAP |
PPP |
Ind. |
MP |
George Town |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1956 |
7 |
5 |
|
|
3 |
|
1957 |
5 |
8 |
|
|
2 |
|
1961 |
1 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
Ipoh |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1956 |
11 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1957 |
9 |
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
1961 |
2 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
Seremban |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1956 |
7 |
5 |
|
|
3 |
|
1957 |
7 |
5 |
|
|
2 |
|
1961 |
4 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
Johore Baharu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1956 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
1957 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
1961 |
10 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
Taiping |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1956 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
1957 |
7 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
1961 |
13 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Malacca |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1956 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
1957 |
6 |
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
1961 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
KONFRONTASI
The geophysical history of Malaya changed radically with the
formation of Malaysia in 1963. This was immediately met with
Indonesian Confrontation which led to the declaration of
Emergency on 3rd September 1964. The Emergency led
to the suspension of local authority elections. This suspension
was executed through the enactment of two regulations, the
Emergency (Suspension of Local Government Elections) Regulation
(1965) and Amendment Regulations (1965). The
suspension was never lifted and in the meantime the government
commissioned an inquiry to study the operation of local
authorities.
The Athi Nahappan Report
In
June 1965 the government set up a “Royal Commission of
Inquiry on Local Authorities” headed by Senator Athi
Nahappan. It completed its work in December 1968 coming out
strongly in support of elected councils. Some of the more
important recommendations made were :- 5
-
Every state capital should be administered by a local
authority and have elective representation. The same
principle should also be extended to all local councils
outside state capitals.
-
There should be one single law applicable throughout the
country relating to and governing local authorities, and every
state should adopt and enforce the law within six months after
it has been passed by Parliament.
-
A local authority should be decentralized and should be an
autonomous body corporate consisting of fully elected members
with financial and administrative autonomy but subject to
control of the State Government on matters of national
importance and interest.
-
Party politics should be allowed to continue despite its good
and bad aspects and candidates should continue to have the
right to stand as “independents”.
-
A Local Government Tribunal should be constituted by the State
Authority of every local authority.
The Commission’s recommendation for the restoration of local
government elections was never adopted. After Konfrontasi came
the 1969 racial clashes and a new declaration of Emergency.
Abolition of Local Authority
Elections
The enactment of the Local Government Act 1976 led to the
abolition of local authority elections. The Act provided that
the Mayor or President and all Councillors of a local authority,
ie City Council, Municipal Council or District Council shall be
appointed by the State Authority. The Commissioner of the City
of Kuala Lumpur would be appointed by the Yang Di Pertuan Agong
on the advise of the Prime Minister.
The Present
This is the system of local government we now have which
accounts for our incomplete or truncated franchise. Hence the
need for obvious reform and the urgent need to seriously
reexamine and reconsider the Athi Nahappan Report for the
restoration of local government elections, especially in the
light of UN Agenda 21, (Chapter 28) which refers to “Local
Authorities Initiatives” as a level of governance closest to the
people. That is the substance of democracy we ought to strive
for as we move towards vision 2020.
In
the meantime we can only hang our heads in shame that a Member
of Parliament, a State Assemblymen and four other public
spirited citizens have been arrested on 1st March
2005 at the Freedom Square (Dataran Merdeka) opposite the
hallowed Courts of Justice for exercising their legitimate right
to campaign for the 3rd vote to give back the vote at
the local level to the people.
The march towards 2020 is not just a matter of computation of
the financial indicators, but must necessarily involve positive
steps for democracy. Bringing back franchise at the local
government level is one such positive step towards achieving
the vision .
1.
S. Sothi Rachagan, (1993) Law And the Electoral Process in
Malaysia ; University of Malaya Press , p4.
2.
ibid p5.
3.
Johan Saravanamuttu, The Snuffing Out of Local Democracy in
Malaysia ; Aliran Vol 20 issue 4 (2000).
4.
Gordon P Means, (1970) Malaysian Politics University of London
Press, p 251.
5.
Saravanamuttu, (2000).
|