It is good that the SIP (Amendment) Bill 2025 aims to establish a more organized and transparent labor data system. However, mandatory vacancy reporting may not contribute effectively to this goal. Job openings do not necessarily indicate the employer’s intent to fill them immediately or at all, nor do they always require the same skills; some vacancies arise due to layoffs or voluntary separation scheme (VSS). In such cases, compulsory reporting could provide inaccurate data to the system.
The clause imposing fines of up to RM10,000 would be better reconsidered as an administrative responsibility of government agencies. The agency should proactively update the system or inquire with employers upon noticing employee social insurance contribution suspensions. After all, this is not a crime and contradicts the SOCSO’s statement of “not to increase the burden on employers” (tanpa memberatkan majikan).
The amendment’s objectives to increase labor market transparency, assist job seekers, and improve unemployment benefits, skills training subsidies, and mobility allowances are also good and helpful to employees. These benefits should not be overshadowed by concerns over mandatory notifications and fines, which risk creating market apprehension.