The claims made by Pascal Najadi that investigations into the case involving his father are incomplete throws serious doubts upon the credibility of the Malaysian police force and the Attorney-Generals chambers.
It also throws doubts into the response of the IGP 3 days ago, that the case is solved.
This is a very serious matter. This is not the first time that we hear of a case where there is a complaint of this nature. We have, amongst others, the case of Teoh Beng Hock where despite clear findings and recommendations by the Court of Appeal, nothing has happened and the case of Altantuuya Shaariibuu where up until now, questions still remain as to who ordered her killing and why.
Where complaints are made of this nature, that investigations are incomplete, then the conduct of the police and the propriety of their investigations are in question. This strikes at public confidence in our justice system.
It is therefore most significant for there to be credible responses to such complaints.
I am of the view that the Attorney-General must reopen the case into the killing of Najadi, focus on the concerns raised by Pascal and respond categorically and publicly to the complaints and concerns raised.
Such complaints cannot just be ignored. They must be dealt with in any event if we are to uphold public confidence in our criminal justice system and those agencies responsible for ensuring that it is effective and also covers all angles of concern in their investigations.